Two Different Instructors On Using Tor Crypto Etc...

[Rayzer]

On 07/19/2016 02:31 AM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 07/18/2016 03:39 PM, juan wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 04:45:19 -0600
>> Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>> My current working hypothesis is that Tor is not broken/breakable by
>>> design.
>>
>> 	keep sucking mirimir - your friend syverson isn't fully
>> 	satisfied yet.
> He's not my friend, Juan. He works for the fucking US Navy, after all.
>
> But I do respect him. Think about it. He and his friends got US military
> funding for a project that provided deniable and secure communication,
> but only by making it public, for use by both funders and their enemies.
>
> It might be that this vulnerability was crucial for selling it to US
> military. But that's distinguishable from the argument that it's
> intentionally designed to be vulnerable. There's also the fact that
> nobody has come up with anything practical that's not vulnerable to
> global adversaries. So it seems unlikely that he had such a design that
> he put aside as unsellable.
>
>

You're arguing logically with a brain-dead troll Mirimir...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160720/ba2efdd7/attachment-0002.sig>