Chaum Fathers Bastard Child To RubberHose ... PrivaTegrity cMix

[juan]

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:30:49 -0800
Alex Stahl <alex at testcore.net> wrote:

> Point is the technology is neutral/agnostic to its location and
> operator - and that a key part of the solution is in fact political.

	Oh yes, I do see that. And it's based on the
	'division-of-power' and 'checks-and-balances' doctrine, which I
	don't find especially convincing or effective.

> 
> Hell, I'm still wondering who would use such a system in the first
> place without the imposition of regulation?

	Well, the leaders of the liberal democracies might be able to
	create a few laws and regulations to adopt chaum's system and 
	save the children from digital terrorism. Or something.


> 
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31:49 AM PST juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:15:36 -0800
> > 
> > Alex Stahl <alex at testcore.net> wrote:
> > > Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a
> > > message were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US,
> > > Canada, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan,
> > 
> > 	I think the actual network would be more like washington,
> > 	boston, new york, los angeles, london, panama, puerto rico,
> > 	marshal islands and maybe brussels.
> 
>