Fwd: [Cryptography] A possible alternative to TOR and PrivaTegrity without backdoors
coderman
coderman at gmail.com
Sun Jan 17 04:31:25 PST 2016
On 1/14/16, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> ... The main criticism I had
> of this was the fact that the system was said to have a minimum bid of 1
> BTC, which at the time was somewhere around $1000. This, contrasting with
> my Assassination Politics essay of 1995-96 where I anticipated allowing bits
> of 10 cents.
> Assassination Market did not explain a lot of what I had considered
> necessary for a functioning such system. How can a potential donor trust the
> system? How can a potential 'predictor' trust the system? How to collect?I
> never tried to research into this, because I judged that to do so would be a
> little too 'hot' for me to do.
i am curious how you arrived at a determination of what was "too hot" :)
how do you pick where to draw that line?
*he says with a toe on something very hot...*
> Did any donations actually appear on the
> system after its initial announcement? Did any new names/targets appear?
there were a few targets added, "bid" transactions successful,
yet my attempt to add my own life to list was for naught. :/
maybe i didn't pay enough... ?
https://blockchainbdgpzk.onion/address/1P6yannm6Rx9kkMH5LxmAsi1GdZ4JZG73T
best regards,
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list