Instead of Apple tasking a coder to work on cracking that iPhone...

[Rayzer]

Steve Kinney wrote:
> The ability to monitor the supply chain inbound to the machinist,
> measure the parts the machinist makes and track them to their
> final destination in a larger assembly external customer, does not
> imply the ability to prescribe a specific manufacturing process,
> make the part in question, or to evaluate its fitness for use for
> a particular purpose.  Those latter functions, and creation of
> specifications as acceptance criteria, are jobs for design and
> production engineers.

DUDE! You're on a tangent. The QA department writes the code to test the
crypto or else your back to a machinist (the code writer) certifying his
own parts (the code). In order to write the code they HAVE to understand
how the fuck the code they're testing works

-- 
RR
"Through counter-intelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble-makers ... And neutralize them, neutralize them, neutralize them"


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160225/54025817/attachment-0003.sig>