[cryptome] (no subject)

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 09:26:59 PST 2016


On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:09:51 -0500
Michael Best <themikebest at gmail.com> wrote:

> ... Being able to hack something doesn't mean there's a backdoor,
> even if you're the one who built it. Hacking != backdoors


	Of course it does. 'Hacking' here means taking advantage of
	some 'bug' you are responsible for. 

	It turns out then that the definitions of 'bug' 'backdoor'
	'hacking' and 'working for the government' get nicely blurred. 

	Awfully convenient for the likes of apple and the likes of you. 

	'plausible deniability' and all that shit.


> Good soundbite, though.

	Dude.
	


> 
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:10 AM, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:
> 
> > If Apple can hack its own security then the products are backdoors.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list