The Intercept steps up after catching a reporter faking data and sources

[Cari Machet]

FUCK

V MAJOR

i have boycotted tor for sooooo many years now

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Ted Smith <tedks at riseup.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 03:37 +0100, coderman wrote:
> > On 2/9/16, Rayzer <Rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Somewhere on Tor's site I ran into something about how Tail's
> > > tor/browser was more secure than the standard torbrowser because of
> > > something the tails folks were doing with iptables. Perhaps they're
> > > 'steering' traffic away from (or yeah, perhaps towards, take that
> anyway
> > > you like...) certain nodes.
> >
> > drop packets that bypass the SOCKS proxy path into Tor client. also,
> > makes sure to plug leaks, like:
> >
> >  iptables -A OUTPUT -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j DROP
> >
> > see also, Whonix-Qubes, etc.
>
> The downside of TAILS is that you don't get entry guards, which is
> pretty major.
>
> --
> Sent from Ubuntu
>



-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3072 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160210/0c336f0c/attachment-0002.txt>