[Rayzer]

Jason McVetta wrote:
> I presume an actually-secure phone would be highly illegal for a
> civilian commoner to possess.  

There's no such thing as 'secure' with any form, of electronic
communication.

There's "More secure".

-- 
RR
"Through counter-intelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble-makers ... And neutralize them, neutralize them, neutralize them"


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160220/e273862a/attachment-0002.sig>