USA To Require Govt Issued ID To Use Internet, No More Anonymous

[juan]

On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:31:02 +0000
Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:

> On 1/21/16, Rayzer <Rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> > juan wrote:
> >> Doesn't your fucking herd have the divine collective right to
> >> identify you?
> >
> > Existence shouldn't be regulated by the society you are part of
> 
> Sounds a good start - you advocate for no birth certificates, marriage
> certificates and death certificates then?
> 
> 
> > but your actions and
> > behaviors might very well be to ensure the survival of the
> > 'herd' if not the species.
> 
> In this statement is a subtlety that catches most people:
> 
> Regulation of lawful/acceptable behaviour,
>  vs
> regulation of unlawful/unacceptable behaviour.



	Looks to me that the political philosophy that Rayzer
	nicely summed up in one sentence is nothing but crass
	totalitarianism.

	'True' 'anarchists' are supposed to be anti-authoritarian, yet
	what we have here is an apology for the unbounded 'authority'
	of the 'herd' (in practice of course, the authority of the
	'herd's' 'representatives')

	

> 
> Should the state "regulate" sex by issuing Fucking licenses, with RFID
> chips to ensure appropriate locations only are used, with
> infringements and points loss for excessive fucking or fucking under
> the influence (won't someone please think of the foetuses that might
> be damaged)?
> 
> Next a breeding license, again with penalties for infraction?
> 
> Or should "the state" regulate intolerable/unacceptable behaviour such
> as rape, when that occurs?
 
> 
> Should the state regulate individual travel by issuing drivers
> licenses?
> 
> Or should the state regulate intolerable/unacceptable road conduct,
> when that occurs?
> 
> The consequences of one are satisfaction of the expectation of the
> herd and curtailing of vigilante justice, the consequences of the
> other are ever greater violations of individual rights, freedoms, etc.