"right" vs permission, to immigrate - "Japan: No Muslims, no terrorists"

[juan]

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:21:27 +0000 (UTC)
jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:


> 
> This essay by Christopher Cantwell pretty much destroys the
> "libertarians must be in favor of open borders" idea.

> https://christophercantwell.com/2015/09/28/open-borders-or-market-immigration/


	So, to wrap this 'issue' up :

	In his article, cantwell correctly describes and acknowledges 
	the libertarian position and then DISMISSES it and REJECTS it as
	'not practical'.

	"But the (good) libertarian will tend to put principle first,
	no doubt" 

	Or perhaps that was meant in a mocking tone, which would be
	further proof that cantwell is his own parody. 

	
	Then he embarks on a pseudo-economical tangent (conservatives
	like to pretende they know 'economics') and introdudes the
	laughable lie that immigration to the US is driven by state
	'welfare'.

	
	So cantwell knows what the libertarian position should be and
	rejects it. He then lies about immigration, and doesn't even
	have the balls to explicitly admit that he's nothing but the
	cheapest conservative DEFENDING THE STATE'S BORDERS. 

	Just in case : libertarianism and the state are 'incompatible'.
	It painfully follows that no libertarian worth his salt would
	defend such crass statist device as the state's borders. 




J.



> 
>                Jim Bell
> 
> 
>