"right" vs permission, to immigrate - "Japan: No Muslims, no terrorists"

[Cecilia Tanaka]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Ben Tasker <ben at bentasker.co.uk> wrote:

> Or perhaps it's simply because Japan's efforts in the middle east are
> limited to Humanitarian aid. Makes it far harder to find victims willing to
> get angry at the Japanese when they're not dropping bombs.
>

​Oh, you know, our tradition is being bombed, not drop the bombs!  ;)

And "no terrorists" is taking it a bit far.
>

​Sincerely?  An article that mentions "No Muslims, no terrorism"​ in its
title and defends this racist idea, this disgusting kind of prejudice, was
completely too far, not just a bit far.


> No jihadi's maybe, but Japan has had it's own share of terrorism in the
> past.
>

​Correct, we had some terrorist attacks in Japan in the past and some of
them were pretty cruel because they used chemical weapons in closed places
with few chances of escape, like the subway, and tried to attack the
buildings where the Japanese government is located.  Sad...  :((

Oh, Lord, Zzz was able to send to our list a fascist article which last
paragraph is:

"
Taking humble and grateful pride once again in what God has done to make
​ ​
America the most exceptional nation in history is not only the right
​ ​
thing to do, it is the safest thing to do.​"


​Yeah, copying a idiot and very racist Japanese concept  ('Sakoku', in
nihongo/Japanese language)  will really help God to make the USA "the most
exceptional nation in History". ​

The racist moron who wrote this article is so stupid and disgusting as the
prejudiced jerk who sent this small-minded and intolerant garbage to a
cypherpunk list.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 4406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20161220/3b22f4df/attachment.txt>