No one provides proof Assange is dead > 1 month now

[Joshua Case]

Such a boring line of technicality. As though anyone is in a position to call themselves "the Russian government" - and deliver 'anonymously' to Wikileaks. Assange guilty of the same duplicitous doublethink as the machine he is destroying. However many hands the documentary evidence passed through by the time Assange was given access, the Feds have the boxes that were wrecked and stolen from, and the NSA has selectors for points of origin for all traffic logged in massive vaults. Who knows, but citing Assange as an authority, as opposed to an actor in this drama is duplicity defined. 

> On Dec 16, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Razer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 12/15/2016 11:48 PM, Zenaan Harkness       wrote:
>> Julian Assange: ‘Our Source Is Not the Russian Government’
>> 
> 
> He said that MONTHS ago. 
> 
> He was just repeating it for the illiterates who need to see it on a Right-Wing TeeVee channel.
> 
> Ps. Handjob & braitfart are a little slow. Like most lIbertards and Fascist alt-Righturds
> 
> Vicious, but really, REALLY slow.
> 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2094 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20161216/34a6c42f/attachment.txt>