more cuck for Barack - Judge Jeanine dishes out another serve

[juan]

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:12:13 +1100
Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:


> 
> Then, any "small fascist communications collective" can also be called
> a private club.

	Well it can be called fascist if it's actually run along
	authoritarian lines. Though no doubt the 'private club' concept
	lends itself to that sort of abuse. 

> 
> The problem with that becomes when that "small fascist collective"
> becomes a large fascist collective, such as Twitter, Google and
> Facebook
> - they are no longer small private clubs.


	Big clubs just amplify the problems caused by small clubs.
	Besides those firms are controlled by small nominally private -
	fascist - clubs. Aka boards of directors and the like.




> 
> AND they advertised themselves specifically on the basis of freedom of
> speech (at least Twitter did).

	'freedom of speech' 'regulated' by the US government...

> 
> And so their actual deceptions to the public (that they are free
> speech platforms), has become a fundamental undermine for us humans
> in the world (those who use said platforms anyway).
> 
> 
> ALSO, these corporations were built on fascist non-free-market
> monopolistic statutory protections.

	Indeed. So they are never going to provide any freedom of
	spreech. Rather they are going to 'shape' speech in cooperation
	with their partner in crime, the state. 


> 
> 
> SO, they should pay a very hefty price for their deception.

	We wish...
	
> 
> 
> They should be forced for example to make it easy to all their members
> to use / interoperate with alternative platforms, and they should have
> to very prominantly display that they are fundamentally fascist.


	Oh yes, that will happen when the state 'voluntary' abolishes
	itself. =)



> 
> 
> 
> Jailing people who publish information and images about the crimes of
> others, protects those who perpetrate the crimes, and hides those
> crimes from the public, feeding the ostrich syndrome of cucked
> loosers.
> 
> So without free speech, we protect criminals.
> 
> 
> 
> > 	Anyway, I agree that some traffic can be classified as
> > outright spam, like, say, advertising posted by bots, but blocking
> > that sort of traffic is not really what's been discussed here. 
> > 
> > 
>