more cuck for Barack - Judge Jeanine dishes out another serve
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 16:45:54 PST 2016
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:15:39 -0500
John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:29 PM, oshwm <oshwm at openmailbox.org> wrote:
> > Wrong thought experiment, a chat is realtime - conversation becomes
> > lost when trolls attack but a mail list allows for emails to hang
> > around long enough to be read and replied to despite any spam that
> > might appear in thw thread.
>
> That was part of the reason I framed it that way. Curious what Juan's
> thoughts were.
Well even in the case of real time text chat, the problem
is trivially solved by filtering at the client's side. Now if
we were talking about a multi-party phone conversation...but
that's a bit more far fetched or an edge case...
On the other hand, you could argue that there are 'private'
communications, but a similar problem would arise. In a small
group it's quite possible that there would be a majority that
wants to impose certain 'rules' about what can or cannot be
said. Which is a problem. Also, the private/public distinction
is rather ambiguous because from the point of view of the
members of the 'private' group, the group works as if it were
public (accessible to all members).
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list