more cuck for Barack - Judge Jeanine dishes out another serve

[John Newman]

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 7:02 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 18:47:49 -0500
> John Newman <jnn at synfin.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> I don't support censorship, all your claims to the contrary ;) At the
>> same time, I don't support people telling me how I can configure my
>> own software on my own hardware whose network traffic I pay for.
> 
> 
>    I "dully" note you  seemt to have ignored everything else I
>    said.
> 
> 


I was curious what your take on the "thought experiment" was. I find the issue maybe a little more nuanced, but I'm not interested in a flame war (at all), so I was happy to hear your take. Dully noted ;)



>     
>> 
>> For instance, I don't consider locking my mail server down so it's
>> not an open relay to be censorship (some people do - see toad.com).
>> Trying to enforce software configurations I'm not interested in, on
>> my shit, under any pretense, is fascism.
> 
> 
>    As long as your hardware doens't carry other people's speech,
>    fine. 
>    
>    The facscist/conservtive dictum "my network, my fascist rules
>    for speech" remains just that however. A fascist dictum.
>     
>    Anyway, I agree that some traffic can be classified as outright
>    spam, like, say, advertising posted by bots, but blocking that
>    sort of traffic is not really what's been discussed here. 
> 
> 
>