Breitbart n' shit

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:01:32PM +0000, jim bell wrote:
>  From: Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
> On 12/06/2016 10:46 PM, Razer wrote:
> >> The folks at Weather.com have asked Breitbart to kindly stop using their
> >> data to create #FakeNews.
> > 
> >> https://weather.com/news/news/breitbart-misleads-americans-climate-change
> > 
> >> ROTF!
> 
> >Good for them. We need more real news, and less fake news.
>
> We could agree with THAT, but I happen to believe that the main
> American sources of fake newsare ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, and
> many others, called the "MSM". 
>
>  We saw in the recent election seasonthat these organizations were
> tending to avoid covering things that were negative to Hillary
> Clinton.This was particularly true once the Wikileaks leaks became
> heavy, a couple of months before theelection, especially.  Sure,
> there's the "fake news" meme, but I don't recall a single email that
> camefrom the DNC/Podesta/Weiner camp that was claimed to have been
> "fake":  By and large, eventuallythe MSM simply refused to publicize
> them.

"But they're private companies, they can publish or not publisch as they
please, they have a right to maximise profit and to execute their
political agendas. Same with Twitter shutting down 'hate speech'
accounts even though half all USAians uses Twitter. Free market."


> That's one big reason I blame the MSM itself for the "fake news"
> phenomenon.  In prior election cycles, generally all the outlets
> covered all the stories...with a different slant and spin, of course.
>  Anaverage person would have a good clue that a given story was fake
> if it came solely from a givensource, or 'side'.  But in 2016 the
> public observed that the MSM was studiously limiting its coverage on
> those issues that happened to be negative to Hillary.  I'm not saying
> that they entirely avoided them, but I think most people would agree
> that their coverage was completely stilted.
>
> As a consequence, it became virtually "normal" for there to be
>  apparently-quite-legitimate stories onone 'side', and not another.
>  This meant that ordinary people no longer had this as a clue to tell
> themwhich thing to believe, and which not to.  
>
>            Jim Bell

-- 
* Certified Deplorable Neo-Nazi Fake News Hunter (TM)(C)(R)
* Executive Director of Triggers, Ministry of Winning
* Weapons against traditional \/\/European\/\/ values:
http://davidduke.com/jewish-professor-boasts-of-jewish-pornography-used-as-a-weapon-against-gentiles/