USA Universities learn the consequences of disrespecting free speech

[juan]

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Cecilia Tanaka" <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com>
> Date: Aug 22, 2016 10:03 PM
> Subject: Re: moving on
> To: "cpunks" <cypherpunks at cpunks.org>
> 
> On Aug 22, 2016 9:47 PM, "Shawn K. Quinn" <skquinn at rushpost.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This (a thinly veiled threat) is completely unacceptable for a
> > civilized
> list. This is exactly the reason why I think it's time to add
> moderation.
> 
> Shawn, I respect you, but this list is always auto-regulating itself
> in an organic way, with its answers and comments, actions and
> reactions.  The own members regulate the list, with no centralized
> moderation.
> 
> I am still against the moderation in an anarchist, a cypherpunk list.



	Congrats Cecilia. That's ONE message against your friend quinn
	and for freedom. But you've written more than one message
	praising the little fascist quinn, so I'm not too impressed,
	sorry. 

	And you fowarded two more messages in which you agree with the
	'no moderation' policy for this list. That's good. 

	But yesterday you clearly stated, again, that the if the tor
	mafia censors 'their' list, that's  because it is  "Their list,
	their rules." - So you clearly side with the totalitarians from
	the pentagon in that case. And so your defense of freedom of
	speech is rather limited and selective.