USA Universities learn the consequences of disrespecting free speech

[juan]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 22:58:55 -0200
Cecilia Tanaka <cecilia.tanaka at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 4, 2016 9:04 PM, "juan" <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >         Maybe you don't, but quinn, whom you are so thouroughly
> > praising,
> certainly does.
> 
> His convictions, not mine.


	What is that supposed to mean? 	He is a shitbag, but
	according to you he is a great. YOU are the one who SIDES with
	a SHITBAG like quinn. It is YOUR problem. 
	
	Do not take me for an idiot, Cecilia. You can't be
	'anti-censorship' and pro-quinn who is a fucking CENSOR.



> 
> >         There's a rather big group of people who support censorship
> > in
> this very same list and as far as I can tell you never speak against
> it or them.
> 
> Please, search better in the list archives and verify my older
> messages.  I already said it would _not_ be correct to moderate a
> cypherpunk list.


	Thanks for making my point again. It's not just this
	list, but any medium. It is not correct to moderate anything.
	You should have just said that, but you didn't.

	As to you speaking against the many censors who advocate
	censorship here, feel free to link your posts criticizing them.
	I doubt there's any.



> 
> >         Furthermore, when the Tor Inc. pentagon nazis censored
> > 'their'
> list your reply was something like "I don't like it but it is their
> list" - so you DO support censorship.
> 
> I was kick-banned of Tor-Talk list and everybody knows I didn't like
> it at all.  

	Completely irrelevant like the rest of your soap-opera-like
	tirade, except for this 

	"I respected their  decision, because it is a Tor Project list
	and it follows their management rules. " 

	"I am not saying their rules are right or fair, but Tor-Talk is
	one of their lists, Juan.  Their list, their rules." 

	
	So you are a fully fledged totalitarian who parrots the most
	stupid, right-wing slogan ever. 

	Newsflash for you Cecilia!! It is not their list. If anything
	it is taxpayer owned. And they have no 'right' to make nor
	'enforce' any 'rules'.

	Like I said Cecilia, you SUPPORT CENSORSHIP. Don't bother
	pretending that you don.t



	
	

	











It was an unpleasent and pretty humiliating experience
> because Boyce said I was doing "rape apology" when defending Jake to
> justify my expulsion.
> 
> I cried for days, in several moments hidden in the bathroom of the
> office, because I didn't want to tell to my co-workers what was
> happening.  I didn't want more judgements about my past, my
> character, about my friend's life and more and more prejudice.  I was
> deeply hurt and the false allegation of "rape apology" still hurts a
> lot until now.
> 
> Boyce and the other moderators, including the 'fake victims', knowed
> I was already raped twice and about my emotional and physical scars.
> It always will be impossible to me to do any kind of rape apology.  I
> was just questioning all the lies and the bullying against Jake,
> against one of my friends, a person who I knowed in person and loved
> a lot.
> 
> I don't think my expulsion was fair or correct, but I respected their
> decision, because it is a Tor Project list and it follows their
> management rules.  I am not saying their rules are right or fair, but
> Tor-Talk is one of their lists, Juan.  Their list, their rules.
> 
> I respect a lot of Tor Project colaborators in the whole world and
> their respective works, their sincere efforts.  I never would harm
> their work or would cause troubles because of injuried pride or
> revolt, Juan.  Sorry, it doesn't work this way.  I will fight against
> censorship when it will be necessary, not only for stubbornness or
> pride.
> 
> Ceci