USA Universities learn the consequences of disrespecting free speech

[Razer]

On 12/05/2016 07:04 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 12/05/2016 08:44 AM, Razer wrote:
>> DUDE You're arguing for the FREE Market system.
>>
>> Despite their lips moving making sounds that they are the most ardent
>> supporters of Fre Markets, Most of the Libertarians I've met or read
>> only believe in Free Markets when it's 'free' the way THEY want it to be
>> free.
>>
>> Kelloggs, a multinational corporation that OWNS MARKETS could give no
>> shits about a pissant little blog like Breitbart. One of their ad people
>> probably thought it might be a good way to pick up a few more customers
>> who'd buy healthyflakes at the local Prepper supply house, but it became
>> a liability... It's history.
> Dude... I'm not arguing for anything. I'm simply explaining the way
> things work in the corporate world, particularly regarding advertising
> and the decisions behind it (I worked in marketing for a while and some
> would say in a way I still do). I'm not saying I like it or that I'm an
> advocate of it. There is a huge difference.
>
> I would not call Breitbart a "pissant little blog" anymore, not with the
> way they are expanding.
>

Sorry. I should have said:
> DUDE You're invoking the FREE Market system to people who only believe
> in it when it suits them.


I seriously doubt their unique readership numbers are expanding in the
sense that there are more people buying into BreitBull. If their
readership is expanding, it's to analyze the information being
inculcated in a number of very dangerous people's minds by the American
Crypto-Fascist Right which Breitbart directly represents, or find out
what all the brouhaha (hahaha!) is about.

Rr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2239 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20161205/cf4c8bbd/attachment.txt>