Appelbaum, CDC, CCC

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 23 19:04:32 PDT 2016


On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 01:42:17 +0000
Sean Lynch <seanl at literati.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:40 PM juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:25:35 +0000
> > Sean Lynch <seanl at literati.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >         Yes, do whatever you need to do so that the wife doesn't
> > > > kick you out 'her' house
> > > >
> > >
> > > I find it amusing that you think this would insult a normal
> > > person.
> >
> >         I'm glad you are amused =)
> >
> >         And what does 'normal' mean? It simply means to go along
> > with whatever stupidity and/or attrocities are fashionable at the
> >         time. Normal == average.
> >
> >
> Well "normal" in this case is being in a relatioship where you're on
> equal terms with your partner 

	/deleted bullshit




> 
> >
> >         So yeah, tor is a great tool for freedom and appelbaum is a
> >         rapist. And you who don't believe in 'conspiracy theories'
> > get your data from mob hearsay.
> >
> >
> The "mob" is just whoever's on the side you disagree with. You want to
> portray them as unthinking, just going with the crowd. But what are
> you doing? Jake is a hero to you, 

	
	LMAO at you Sean. I made it quite clear, many times, that I
	consider appelbaum a corrupt clown. He was a US military
	contractor getting 100K per year while pretending to be an
	'anarcho commie' and 'feminist' to boot. (serves him well)


> and a fellow man, and you already
> believed Tor wasn't to be trusted, 

	I *know* what tor is, and I know the moral standing of its sick
	apologists like appelbaum AND you.

	Oops Sean. Turns out that you are quite similar to appelbaum. A
	lackey of the feminazis. A propagandist for US military
	projects like tor and full time accomplice, ah, employee of
	google. 

	Again. LMAO at you Sean. With 'allies' like you freedom needs
	no enemies. 

	

> so no thought is even necessary.
> He's "obviously" innocent and the victim of a smear campaign.
	
	Innocent as long as your feminazi bullshit is concerned. 
	

> 
> But name a public rape accusation that hasn't instantly had multiple
> smear campaigns spin up against the *accusers*. 

	bla bla bla 


> 
> There are clear and obvious smear campaigns going on here, and not a
> lot of rational thought. I'm inclined to just discount "the usual
> suspects" whom the MRA label fits like a glove, and to believe people
> who had to write public announcements that were clearly very
> difficult for them and put their reputations on the line and shake up
> an important project.

	I don't even know what you're talking about.


> 
> You talk about not needing enemies with "libertarians like me", but
> you obviously "need" enemies because you see them around every single
> corner. You have considered Tor an enemy from the start, and now
> you're ready to write off the CDC, CCC, Debian, Shari Steele and
> probably the EFF in one fell swoop.

	
	Of course. And if you bothered to check the cpunks archives of
	TWENTY YEARS AGO you'd knew the EFF were already seen as
	sellouts. 



> But really, I suspect the only thing the TLAs need for this particular
> battle is a large supply of popcorn. But given that I expect a lot
> more projects and organizations will be starting to purge their own
> Appelbaums and/or encouraging them to start treating women and
> everyone else like human beings.

	Ha ha ha. You fucking americunt pyscho pretending to be the
	good guy. 

	Sorry sonny. I know the ABC of americunt, lefty, fascist 
	propaganda.

	Tell me how much you 'respect' women while you murder millions
	of men, women and children all over the world. 

> 
> Speaking of "everyone else", I note you call Chelsea Manning "he",

	Yep. He's a man. 


> presumably because doing the opposite of what the "PC crowd" wants
> you to do is more important to you than civility, even (perhaps
> especially) to people who have suffered from discrimination all their
> lives.
> 
> WIth "libertarians" like you, it's no surprise that few people who
> care in the slightest about anyone who's not exactly like them is
> willing to identify themselves as "libertarian." 


	Which is a Good Thing. Already 99% of the people who call
	themselves libertarians are politically correct pieces of shit
	like you OR lunatic jew-kkkristian conservaties. 






> Because your
> "liiberty" is not "free to be you and me," it's just "free to be me."
> You want the freedom but not the responsibility to think about the
> consequences of your actions for others. No wonder you're such an
> Appelbaum fan: he's exactly what you aspire to be.




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list