I swear I'm not making this up

[grarpamp]

On 8/4/16, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> think it might have been ALSO Russia. Apparently the NSA is just furious
> To me, the identity and
> motives of this specific attacker are entirely unimportant:

>From a leak the docs perspective sure.
But ID of the real doers still have geopolitical ramifications.

> It is clear
> that the Democrats are just trying to divert attention from their own.

True as with all politicians.
Laughably, these days why bother with forming and defending
a real platform when you can win on bashing others and empty
slogans alone.

> I do notice is that when it was Hillary's private server that perhaps was
> being hacked, the media and government said a collective "ho hum"

As with all actors when taken on individual level, and at certain times,
Hillary is both worth protecting, useful idiot, and expendable player
on team new order.

> but when
> the DNC got that treatment, suddenly the FBI is motivated to
> act.  Double-standard?

Could be
false act, after all FBI feed at mouth of NSA too, so will
steer investigation into dead end.
or
false act, for FBI to fake looking good in news as top cop.
or
true act, to try to shut NSA and take top dog from Intel.
In which case NSA Bluffdale just leaks some of its FBI taps to press.

Beware secret unaccountable tools you create, they can bite back.