Pay for Play, Influence Peddling, Tor and Hillary/Russia

[Razer]

On 2016-08-03 21:18, juan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:29:32 -0700
> Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 08/03/2016 05:09 PM, juan quoted me saying:
>> 
>>     If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
>> would allow such things
>> 
>> 
>> Or else I wouldn't be doing the job right schmuck. I also have noted
>> that I'd NEVER be doing a job like that:
>> 
>> > (which is why I never aspired to that sort of position... my
>> > underhand toss is lousy),
>> 
>> Thanks for sharing... Troll.
> 
> 
> 
> 	Your comment is rather ambiguous. What's your point then? Are
> 	you finally admiting that the tor project is even more of a joke
> 	than it already was, now featuring built-in-censorship (TM)? Or
> 	what.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Rr
>> 
>> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:45:11 -0700
>> > Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 08/02/2016 09:00 PM, jim bell wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> “…the committee requires that spend plans submitted by the
>> >>> Department of State and BBG pursuant to section 7078(c) of the act
>> >>> include a description of safeguards to ensure that circumvention
>> >>> technologies are not used for illicit purposes, such as
>> >>> coordinating terrorist activities or online sexual exploitation of
>> >>> children,”
>> >> If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
>> >> would allow such things
>> >
>> > 	Spoken like a true americunt right-winger rayzer. Hardly
>> > 	surprising, no?
>> >
>> > 	So you are not only admiting tha you are a right winger, you
>> > 	are a highly stupid right winger who's openly admiting that
>> > 	'anonimity' software 'should' be sabotaged.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 


You aren't very bright. That's what I'm saying.

If you didn't note the insinuation in what I wrote You should note it 
now. Troll.

Rr