Pay for Play, Influence Peddling, Tor and Hillary/Russia

[juan]

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:29:32 -0700
Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/03/2016 05:09 PM, juan quoted me saying:
> 
>     If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
> would allow such things 
> 
> 
> Or else I wouldn't be doing the job right schmuck. I also have noted
> that I'd NEVER be doing a job like that:
> 
> > (which is why I never aspired to that sort of position... my
> > underhand toss is lousy),
> 
> Thanks for sharing... Troll.



	Your comment is rather ambiguous. What's your point then? Are
	you finally admiting that the tor project is even more of a joke
	than it already was, now featuring built-in-censorship (TM)? Or
	what.








> 
> Rr
> 
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:45:11 -0700
> > Rayzer <rayzer at riseup.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/02/2016 09:00 PM, jim bell wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> “…the committee requires that spend plans submitted by the
> >>> Department of State and BBG pursuant to section 7078(c) of the act
> >>> include a description of safeguards to ensure that circumvention
> >>> technologies are not used for illicit purposes, such as
> >>> coordinating terrorist activities or online sexual exploitation of
> >>> children,” 
> >> If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
> >> would allow such things 
> >
> > 	Spoken like a true americunt right-winger rayzer. Hardly
> > 	surprising, no? 
> >
> > 	So you are not only admiting tha you are a right winger, you
> > 	are a highly stupid right winger who's openly admiting that
> > 	'anonimity' software 'should' be sabotaged.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>