moving on (multiple future forks)

[oshwm]

Better still would be a way for any number of list servers to co-exist without delivering multiple copies of mail.

This would allow anyone to set up another server at will and add robustness to the system.

Is this already in existence or a new idea, is it even a valid idea?


On 23 August 2016 10:46:14 GMT+01:00, Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:07:51AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:51:23PM -0700, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
>> > Folks,
>> > 
>> > After 15+ years running a cypherpunks node, it's quitting time for
>me.
>> > I plan to delete the mailman aliases on September 30th.
>> > 
>> > If anyone is interested in migrating the list to his or her machine
>> > before then, that would be great; let's discuss on-list.
>> >
>>  
>> So far I saw two offers to host the list after 30.Sep.
>> 
>> IMHO two or more future lists won't hurt. Everyone can set a
>> cypherpunks list (but won't get the past reputation of this one, if
>any).
>
>Is there a way to set up two or three email servers acting in
>concensus,
>basically mirrormiring each other, but not duplicating emails to the
>subscribers?
>
>That way there'd be less time pressure when one person wants to move on
>(Riad, you're a gentleman - thank you again.)

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160823/368c3b9e/attachment-0002.txt>