Tor being forked.

[Cari Machet]

why not develop ????????????????????????????

tor is perfect we have reached the pennacle of everything on the planet so
why would anything need development anywhere /..... all sectors are solid
perfection ... no need for any human to even move a pinky finger

a main stance for tor has long been to function just at the level to keep
development from being too needed so the people would not move beyond it

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:

> On 08/20/2016 12:04 AM, Александр wrote:
> > Great news.
> >
> > For those who have suggested it there's already plans and a roadmap for
> the
> >> fork of Tor. Two concurrent networks which are compatible with a
> singular
> >> browser would greatly diversify the ecosystem and give users more
> choice.
> >> At this point this is the only way forward imo. More info:
> >> https://rotorbrowser.com
>
> I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is
> fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries.
> Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be
> vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better?
>
>


-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2622 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160820/c6d5cc23/attachment-0002.txt>