Tor being forked.

[oshwm]

Without being able to offer my time, my comments don't carry much
weight, but it would be great if it natively supported i2p as well :)

I can configure TBB to support i2p (there are instructions out there for
everyone) but it would give i2p greater exposure and people an obvious
choice if i2p was supported without any configuration work.


On 20/08/16 07:04, Александр wrote:
> Great news.
>
>     For those who have suggested it there's already plans and a
>     roadmap for the fork of Tor. Two concurrent networks which are
>     compatible with a singular browser would greatly diversify the
>     ecosystem and give users more choice. 
>     At this point this is the only way forward imo. More
>     info: https://rotorbrowser.com <https://rotorbrowser.com/>
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160820/2d77ad41/attachment-0002.sig>