Quantum entangled-photon Chinese satellite.

juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 22:58:15 PDT 2016


On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 07:19:19 +0200
Bastiani Fortress <bastianifortress at yandex.com> wrote:

> As i can remember, the point was when two particles are entangled,
> they bear the same quantum state, and they simultaneously shift their
> states önce either of them is "observed". 

	OK.

> So you know that the other
> twin is in the same state, but you cannot code it at will, 

	Not sure what you mean by "code it".


> and since
> you don't know its first state without having "observed" it, you
> cannot determine whether the other twin has been observed or not

	And now I'm even more confused =P

	But let's go back to your first sentence. You have a couple of
	'entangled' particles. Trying to measure particle 'A' triggers
	a change in particle 'B' - is that what you are saying? 

	If that's the case, then you do have 'information transfer' -
	one bit. 


> (that would be 1 bit of data streaming).
> 
> This is what i remember from what i read years ago, please correct me
> if i'm wrong.
> 
>




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list