Quantum entangled-photon Chinese satellite.
juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 22:58:15 PDT 2016
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 07:19:19 +0200
Bastiani Fortress <bastianifortress at yandex.com> wrote:
> As i can remember, the point was when two particles are entangled,
> they bear the same quantum state, and they simultaneously shift their
> states önce either of them is "observed".
OK.
> So you know that the other
> twin is in the same state, but you cannot code it at will,
Not sure what you mean by "code it".
> and since
> you don't know its first state without having "observed" it, you
> cannot determine whether the other twin has been observed or not
And now I'm even more confused =P
But let's go back to your first sentence. You have a couple of
'entangled' particles. Trying to measure particle 'A' triggers
a change in particle 'B' - is that what you are saying?
If that's the case, then you do have 'information transfer' -
one bit.
> (that would be 1 bit of data streaming).
>
> This is what i remember from what i read years ago, please correct me
> if i'm wrong.
>
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list