Pay for Play, Influence Peddling, Tor and Hillary/Russia

[Rayzer]

On 08/02/2016 09:16 PM, juan wrote:



> 	Tor works exactly as designed. It is a 'honeypot'. 

Prove intent if you're going to make that claim.

(Crickets chirping...)

It's a FLAG YOU WAVE that lets them 'kettle' you into a honeypot if your
security is lax.

Which is why I say we need millions of "flag wavers" to assist in the
obscuring process.

No matter the technology. No matter the code. If you are the only person
using it and the government, for whatever reason doesn't want you to,
you're a dead duck eventually.

Rr


> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 04:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
> jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the
>> solution will be that the Tor project team will study how to insert
>> "anti-bad-people"chaff into the Tor streams, increase the number of
>> hops 
> 	The number of hops is irrelevant because the tor network fails
> 	'at the edges'. It doesn't matter how many times you bounce
> 	stuff inside the network since the traffic is 'correlated' when
> 	it enters/leaves the network.
>
>
>> (more to confuse the "bad people"; they confuse the hell out of
>> me!), etc.  Eventually, they will have to sadly announce that they
>> haven't yet fully succeeded  in preventing"bad people" from using
>> Tor, but they HAVE greatly improved security in various ways. 
>
> 	What makes you think that military contractors for the US
> 	military(i.e. tor) have any interest in improving the security
> 	of the enemies of the US gov't/military? 
>
> 	Tor works exactly as designed. It is a 'honeypot'. 
>
>
>
>
> Jim Bell
>>   
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160803/e179d419/attachment-0002.sig>