Robert De Niro and Autism – a Tragic Drama of Intimidation

[juan]

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:22:19 -0400
Ted Smith <tedks at riseup.net> wrote:

> and Juan "You're just an agent of the American Fascists" Garofalo

	some of you are, others like garvey are left-wing fascist clowns
	hostile to libertarian politics and thus hostile to core
	'cypherpunk' 'values'

	so fuck you. shitbag.  

	I stated : "It would be interesting to learn how many
	crypto-anarchists were driven off" 

	Now tell me stupid shitbag smith, who are the 'anarchists' that 
	left this fine mailing list. 

	
	I do agree that this list is pretty much a joke. And that is 
	because of people like you and because of the fact that there
	isn't any real opposition to government to be found, anywhere.

	And arent' you just another one of those tor cunts on the
	pentagon's payroll, "Ted Smith"? 


	
(first post 9/09/2013)  with the follow-through:
> 
>  * Cathal Garvey (last post 10/16/2015)
>  * Eugen Leitl (last post 10/26/2015)
>  * Peter Gutmann (seems to only troll now, but still posts)
>  * James A. Donald (last post 01/24/2016)
	
	pretty much a 'libertarian' right winger - why does a
	lefty-pentagon-clown like you worry about him? 


>  * John Young still posts, but substantially less



	Oh JY is one of the few sane voices here. I doubt you ever read
	or understood any of his posts. If you did you'd know that he
	doesn't take any of this 'security' stuff seriously, and rightly
	so.



> And now we're left with the above two concern trolls and company who
> never even sent email to al-qaeda.net.


	Go ahead and link your posts to the any previous cpunk mailing
	list. I'll be waiting. 





> 
> It's an abject falsehood that raising the noise to totally drown out
> any signal and alienating the entire rest of the list is somehow not
> harmful to the list. 
> 
> Nobody who A.) has no concrete contribution to the community and/or
> B.) never posted to al-qaeda.net has any business posting more than,
> say, John Young. This isn't censorship, this is the continuity of the
> community. Just because you CAN spam cpunks with autism and racial
> strength doesn't mean it's necessarily cypherpunk to do so. 
> 
> Maybe submit to /r/DarkFuturology, guys? You'd probably get more
> engagement.
> 
> On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 16:20 -0300, juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:24:39 -0700
> > Shelley <shelley at misanthropia.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > I generally
> > > ignore this list because of the nonsensical mess a few of you have
> > > made of it, which has driven off so many others as well. 
> > 
> > 
> > 	It would be interesting to learn how many crypto-anarchists
> > 	were driven off. On the other hand it's quite clear that
> > some of the people who left were outright hostile to the fundamental
> > 	and most basic tenet of cypherpunks : political anarchy.
> > 
> > 	Also, the fact that some people sometimes post off topic
> > stuff doesn't prevent other people from posting on topic stuff does
> > 	it? 
> > 
> > 
> > > Back to
> > > ignore mode.
> > > 
> > > -S
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----------
> > > On April 17, 2016 10:42:50 AM  Александр  <afalex169 at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > 2016-04-17 19:33 GMT+03:00 Shelley <shelley at misanthropia.org>:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Why do you persist in posting this OT bullshit on a
> > > > > > cypherpunks
> > > > > listserv?  Go find a subreddit to pollute with your shitposts.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > That's your own IMHO. You forgot to mention that.
> > > > You've got thousands of people on this list. Not only you/a few
> > > > more people who keep whining about "shitposts/ offtopic".
> > > > 
> > > > By the way, i never read any of your own "great/ONtopic" posts
> > > > (not
> > > > talking about comments).
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> >