Key Compromise Related to Architectural Work Not Cryptome

[John Young]

Nobody sane has ever met JYA, just not possible. But several cpunks
and USG officials have. But none of those use PGP after learning
what precludes sanity and is replaced with blind faith in the math when
crypto is implanted.

GPG is further down the wormhole of instability.

As RH pithed on PRZ's shoes: children of code-cobblers have none.

At 04:46 AM 9/19/2015, you wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 06:57:58AM -0400, John Young wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > 18 September 2015
> >
> > Key compromise is related to our architectural work on NYC No. 7
> > Subway Line Extension, recently opened. Project had hundreds of
> > designers from around the world with access to files. Security of
> > the project is primary and its design is not public. Extent of
> > subway system security and file protection is restricted to
> > need to know.
> >
> > JYA and Cryptome passphrases remain secure. Key revocation done
> > for caution.
> >
>
>While this messages passes gpg verification with the alleged JYA's key,
>I doubt he wrote it (at least in a relatively sane state).
>
>If someone knows JYA, please confirmed the message is indeed from him.