Anyone familiar with SEO (Search Engine Optimization) techniques? I have a mystery.

Oshwm oshwm at openmailbox.org
Sat Sep 12 00:12:41 PDT 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Basically, right click in page, choose 'view source' from the menu and then search for Bell within the displayed text.

There's your hidden text :)

There's a bunch of 'metadata' in any web page used for controlling shit like this that is never visible on the actual web page.
View source will show this.


On 12 September 2015 07:53:57 BST, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>I found this partial explanation:  
> http://www.seochat.com/c/a/search-engine-optimization-help/hidden-text-in-websites/
>and                                            
>  http://www.seologic.com/faq/hidden-text
>and                                            
>  http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/hidden-text-website-34580.html
>and                                            
>  https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=en
>                 Jim Bell
>      From: jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com>
>To: Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>; "cypherpunks at cpunks.org"
><cypherpunks at cpunks.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 11:38 PM
>Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with SEO (Search Engine Optimization)
>techniques? I have a mystery.
>
>From: Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
>On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
>jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> For those who can help, please do a Google search for 'Bell further
>>> alleged in his 2003'You will notice that there are MANY results that
>>> contain that phrase, but have something close to gibberish, before
>>> and after it.  
>
>
> >Weird. The search results I'm seeing (first page)
>>    1) book titled "crypto anarchy"
>   
>  >  2)
> >
>  http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/ridgefield-connecticut-public-records.html
>
> >   3)
> >
>  http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/jail-records-vine.html
>
> >   4)
> >
>  http://www.snowcitycafe.com/assets/28115041/service/do-you-have-to-get-a-background-check-to-buy-.html
>
>>    5) Jim's wikipedia article
>
> >   6)
>>  
>http://buriedwithoutceremony.com/wp-includes/service/indiana-state-police-records-division.html
>
> >   7)
>>  
> http://buriedwithoutceremony.com/wp-includes/service/arizona-public-records-wills.html
>
>>    8)
> >
>  http://www.vinnatur.org/wp-includes/service/free-website-to-view-criminal-records.html
>
> >   9)
>
>>  
> http://www.vinnatur.org/wp-includes/service/free-criminal-records-bureau-uk.html
>
> >   10)
>
> >
>  http://culturesource.net/data/records/criminal-background-guidelines.html
>
>
> >   results 2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10 all go to the same spam page. 
>I think you're wrong about that.  It isn't "the same spam page".
> Rather, it is multiple copies of what amounts to (looks like, to the
>human eye) the same spam page, but located at different URLs.
>
>
> >   In other words, google is such an incredible piece of shit that
>>    they can't even run a search engine?
>Again, I think you're wrong about that.  I don't think Google has done
>anything wrong, here.  Rather, I think that someone else has
>manufactured many pages which look alike to the human eye, but
>apparently contain hidden text that can be searched for and found.
> Google-search has simply catalogued the search results, including the
>otherwise-invisible text.  (White characters on a white background
>can't be read by eye, but they can be read by Google-search.)
>
>
>>> Some results are genuine, but most are apparently not.
>>>  I suspect that I am the victim of some sort of SEO-techniques,
>
>
>>    ...that work against an IT company that rules the universe and
> >   has a 'market cap' of 428 000 million dollars...
>Again, I think you're wrong.  What I believe I have seen does not "work
>against" anybody, except possibly me.  Google is simply cataloguing the
>web pages it sees, as the person (or organization) that produced those
>pages intends.  The only negative consequence, to Google-search, is
>that they have to catalog a few hundred kilobytes more of web-pages.
> That's no skin off Google-search's nose.  And as far as I understand,
>the only tricky thing here is that text is present on these pages which
>cannot be read by a human.  If I knew more about the Web than I do, I
>would probably understand how to adjust my web browser to display
>visibly what would otherwise be invisible text.  The next question is,
>"what does this mean, and who produced this, and why?".   I posted this
>query to find somebody who had experience in SEO techniques.
>
>
>
>             Jim Bell
>
>
>> attempting to cover up the fact of the fake, forged appeal case
>> 99-30210.  I suspect that the following company had something to do
>> with it:   http://www.icmconsulting.com/seo.html  See, for
>>
>instance, http://www.simcoehall.com/service/background-check-expunged.html
>>       Jim Bell
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
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==
=FR05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list