mailing list etiquette violators list

[John Young]

All of the originals are stego, ambitiously stego'd large
twice, and continuing with every message. Insert stego
here, ridicule and forward hollowing like a monkey
with tiny balls, to Slashdot, Reddit, 4chan, Wayback,
Google, Snowden, Manning, WikiLeaks, Il Papa, Wailing
Wall, SecureDrop Honey Pot.

cc, bcc, spam, sock puppet, cloud, gameboy, slop it.
























At 04:56 PM 10/25/2015, you wrote:
>There are still some types of "disrespect" I haven't committed yet, I'll
>have to cover those off with future emails :D
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 25/10/15 20:47, Juan wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:31:24 +0100
> > stef <s at ctrlc.hu> wrote:
> >
> >> after the much successful list of coderman regarding
> >> contributors-to-be- filtered, allow me to present you the list of the
> >> most - netiquette-wise - unrespectful contributors to this list:
> >>
> >> (you can find the explanation of each lint in the source code here:
> >> https://gist.github.com/stef/f35c1339d7013f7966b8)
> >>
> >> 405  juan.g71 at gmail.com
> >>         nlbloat              279 70%
> >>         quotebloat           75 18%
> >
> >       newlines and meaninful quotes, yes of course. both 
> completly by design
> >
> >       fuck
> >
> >       your
> >
> >       newline
> >
> >       counting
> >
> >       script
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>