[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[Shelley]

On October 12, 2015 4:09:39 AM Michael Best <themikebest at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is weird, right? I feel like I'm in Zoolander, "taking crazy pills" I
> didn't ask the list the right way but JYA lying/accusing gets nothing?

Resistance is futile!  It's far better to just walk away from an argument 
with Cari than to feel like you're losing your sanity.  You'll never "win" 
or get your point across clearly, no matter how many times you repeat it.  
Her lack of punctuation and logic hurts my brain, please make it stop!

-S


>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No i am talking about this list - this list is a community
> >
> > You did not ask this list for help that i can see ... prove me wrong
> >
> > You are saying jy did not admit ... you complain about it yet accept no
> > critique of said by you
> >
> > Have a think about it go for a walk rest take a few days and get back to
> > me after
> > On Oct 11, 2015 7:38 PM, "Michael Best" <themikebest at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> *Cari Machet* carimachet at gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> 
> <carimachet%40gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CCAGRDzQWNCCe7AUOL%3D-YoFUdi5%2Bm2KPxsq30D3OJzgJjQUrMaCw%40mail.gmail.com%3E>*Sun
> >>> Oct 11 12:25:43 EDT 2015*
> >>> reveal was to protect the community (fr john) then why was that act >
> >>> protecting the community > avoided by mike
> >>
> >> Plus no ask to the list but said asked the list and if the point of the
> >>>
> >>
> >> First email asked for help, no reason the list was excluded from that
> >> even though I explicitly asked John for help verifying it. Then I asked
> >> open endedly on Twitter.
> >>
> >> Also, you seem to be confusing this list with the community of Cryptome's
> >> visitors. There's overlap, sure, but they are *not* the same.
> >>
> >> Plus, John deleted the early emails I made to the Cryptome list, which is
> >> more explicitly the mailing list that would be best identified as the
> >> community you're referring to.
> >>
> >