why we need more cryptome mirrors, in all corners

[John Young]

And, best, no pun, every mirror unique and as flawed as their
makers, like none other, especially differing from the source
and its makers. Mirrors are mirrors, like originals, are always
illusory and evermore changing and degrading -- with crypto
and comsec and infosec.

Archives, drops, mirrors, crypto, USBs, AWstats, leaks, Wiki
fools gold. This forum a grain of a great Sahara. From these
grains mirrors of mirrors of mirrors. Forsoothed Alice to
narcissistic Bob.



At 06:45 PM 10/11/2015, you wrote:
>On 10/10/15, Shelley <shelley at misanthropia.org> wrote:
> > ...
> > The Cryptome archives *are* publicly accessible.  John limits bots and
> > leechers to a certain number of files per day (as is his right, he is
> > paying for the bandwidth), approx 100 iirc, but anyone who can use search
> > strings can find anything on the site.
>
>
>it is exceptionally difficult, short of ordering physical duplicates,
>to obtain a significant portion of cryptome archive from cryptome.org.
>
>part of this is inherent abuse - any mirror gets serious algorithmic
>beatings - akin to HackingTeam mirrors perhaps, not counting the
>mindless cloud VM bot walkers, annoying enough.  even the hidden
>service only mirrors got offensive proddings. remember, some of
>cryptome-opponents are relying on obscurity - thwarted every time some
>makes a mirror...
>
>for this, i am quite grateful to see the archive.org natsec section
>expanded with cryptome mirror!
>https://archive.org/details/nationalsecurityarchive
>
>thanks to all involved (esp. you, Michael :)
>
>
>best regards,