Nominee officers and directors (was: Why cryptome sold web logs...)

[coderman]

On 10/11/15, wirelesswarrior at safe-mail.net
<wirelesswarrior at safe-mail.net> wrote:
> Despite almost two decades of cypherpunk activity I cannot fathom why U.S.
> residents operate sites clearly in the cross-hairs of intel agencies.

there is a specific gambit or protection as US citizen operating a
personal service with personal resources and not in any formal or
for-profit manner.

in some circumstances, against some adversaries, this provides the
best "signal of interest" to respond to, although as you state:
absolute protection is near impossible in a moment, let alone
maintained...


it works great... until it doesn't?
  [ ah well, grarpamp said we were playing for keeps! *grin* ]