Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

[Razer]

On 10/11/2015 11:37 AM, bbrewer wrote:
> Has anyone stopped to think that perhaps it was on absolute purpose as a warning of lack of safety on his servers due to known 'but unable to speak about’ system compromise? Ie. The same fashion as a warrant canary, or what have you?

I thought about that. AAMOF I posted that thought about another website
that had been behaving oddly recently.

On 10/02/2015 09:53 AM, in the thread "Re: What is this "Weird garbled
Windows 7 update"?", Razer wrote:

> Suppose it's a way to mass-distribute a dead 'canary', offed by someone
> in the company who knows something the company wasn't willing to kill
> it's 'canary' over?
>
> Just rumormongering...
>
> RR
>



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151011/5606508a/attachment-0003.sig>