Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

[Razer]

On 10/10/2015 01:57 PM, rysiek wrote:
> Dnia sobota, 10 października 2015 13:39:55 Razer pisze:
>> On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote:
>>> Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention
>>> is worth in terms of money.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For
>> some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician.
> So... are you saying Michael Best is profiting from disclosure of Cryptome 
> server logs with full metadata of Cryptome users? I wonder who made those logs 
> available in the first place!

I dunno. Did BB make any money from acting the 'unofficial spokesman for
anonymous', or did that happen later, now that he has a contributor spot
on the_Intercept_

>
> Are you also saying that John Young's name's appearance in DailyDot or any 
> other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as 
> distributor?
>

Apples-Oranges. John Young's appearance in name was not by his choice.

RR


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/05a2653e/attachment-0003.sig>