[cryptome] Re: NatSecGeek

[Michael Best]

Yep. Thought tacit acknowledgment in first answer was clear, but like it
was lost in translation as too often happens with email. My fault. Ad
hominem anticipation was in response to the bombing comment.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Georgi Guninski <guninski at guninski.com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:14:57AM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
> > Here's the windup... and the pitch...
> > It looks like it's gonna be an ad hominem!
> > Best doesn't swing at it. Ball one.
> >
>
> In case you can't understand the question, are you this?:
> https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek
> According to:
> http://www.dailydot.com/politics/cryptome-ip-leak-john-young-michael-best/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1243 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151010/a45f17e3/attachment-0002.txt>