[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[Mirimir]

On 10/09/2015 07:19 PM, Michael Best wrote:
>>
>> Maybe because Mike _published_ the fucking logs, just because JYA was
>> doing the mirror shades thing about whether the archive was or was not
>> genuine? I mean, JYA can be a very funny man. For sure. But does that
>> justify publishing Cryptome access logs?
> 
> 
> I published them to verify the data, *AFTER JYA publicly accused me of
> FAKING it.* I only raised the point of the logs because of the GCHQ slide. *If
> *John had verified it a week earlier, or not accused me of faking data
> (with ZERO evidence, and the data turns out to be legit) *they never
> would've been published. *

Publishing them was still unwarranted. You could have published a
redacted version. You could have polled this list, and verified selected
lines. Whatever. Yes, JYA was being a jerk. But still ...