Introduce randommess in keypress timings

[Travis Biehn]

Lovely,
I'm interested in the insanity that would ensue from trying to get 'these
populations' to agree on priorities for development efforts.

-Travis

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:21 AM, oshwm <oshwm at openmailbox.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 07/10/15 14:25, Travis Biehn wrote:
> > Normalizing / randomizing is fine. Anonymity sticks out, hasn't learned
> to
> > blend in.
> >
> > Keyboard timing is way down the list gentlemans. If you want to avoid it,
> > get drunk every time you use a webapp.
>
> Fair point, has anyone ever produced a peer agreed priority ordered list
> of privacy and anonymity threatening devices or software etc classified
> with either solved/not solved?
>
> It's a simple stupid question and I probably know the answer but is it
> something needed so that globally all activists/coders/etc can work
> through it?
>
>
>


-- 
Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn>
| TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
<https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1738 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151007/97d25f19/attachment-0002.txt>