[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[Michael Best]

>
> That you refuse to have self critique proves point of an irresponsible
> mindset toward the community


John's not notifying Cryptome's users/visitors through the website? NOT an
irresponsible mindset towards the community. For some reason. Ditto his
deleting the first posts to the Cryptome mailing list raising the issue.
Not irresponsible or driven by ego. At. All.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:

> That is complete bollocks i wrote over and over about johns bullshit...
> acknowledging it
>
> That you refuse to have self critique proves point of an irresponsible
> mindset toward the community
>
> I am not alone here others stated the same i am just following what you
> pointed to as big proof you made an ask to the list... which i do not see
> at all
>
> If ypu acknowledge the issue maybe your ego will get out of the way and
> you can shift behavior if you dont even acknowledge the behavior you will
> be on repeat cycle - not acceptable
>
> Shelly brain hurt? Not surprising
> On Oct 12, 2015 4:12 PM, "Shelley" <shelley at misanthropia.org> wrote:
>
>> On October 12, 2015 4:09:39 AM Michael Best <themikebest at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> This is weird, right? I feel like I'm in Zoolander, "taking crazy pills" I
>>> didn't ask the list the right way but JYA lying/accusing gets nothing?
>>>
>>
>> Resistance is futile!  It's far better to just walk away from an argument
>> with Cari than to feel like you're losing your sanity.  You'll never "win"
>> or get your point across clearly, no matter how many times you repeat it.
>> Her lack of punctuation and logic hurts my brain, please make it stop!
>>
>> -S
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > No i am talking about this list - this list is a community
>>> >
>>> > You did not ask this list for help that i can see ... prove me wrong
>>> >
>>> > You are saying jy did not admit ... you complain about it yet accept no
>>> > critique of said by you
>>> >
>>> > Have a think about it go for a walk rest take a few days and get back
>>> to
>>> > me after
>>> > On Oct 11, 2015 7:38 PM, "Michael Best" <themikebest at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> *Cari Machet* carimachet at gmail.com
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <carimachet%
>>> 40gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D%20Re%3A%20%5Bcryptome%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CCAGRDzQWNCCe7AUOL%3D-YoFUdi5%2Bm2KPxsq30D3OJzgJjQUrMaCw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>> >*Sun
>>> >>> Oct 11 12:25:43 EDT 2015*
>>> >>> reveal was to protect the community (fr john) then why was that act >
>>> >>> protecting the community > avoided by mike
>>> >>
>>> >> Plus no ask to the list but said asked the list and if the point of
>>> the
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> First email asked for help, no reason the list was excluded from that
>>> >> even though I explicitly asked John for help verifying it. Then I
>>> asked
>>> >> open endedly on Twitter.
>>> >>
>>> >> Also, you seem to be confusing this list with the community of
>>> Cryptome's
>>> >> visitors. There's overlap, sure, but they are *not* the same.
>>> >>
>>> >> Plus, John deleted the early emails I made to the Cryptome list,
>>> which is
>>> >> more explicitly the mailing list that would be best identified as the
>>> >> community you're referring to.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 5083 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151012/672965a2/attachment-0002.txt>