[cryptome] Re: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

Razer Rayzer at riseup.net
Sun Oct 11 13:25:03 PDT 2015



On 10/11/2015 01:04 PM, Michael Best wrote:
> That would explain keeping silent, *NOT* making up lies about me and
> saying the data is fake. 

I'm not going to make JYA's argument here, even if what's been assumed
is fact, but the strategy would be a stall at least with the potential
for redirection from the 'dead canary' hypothesis because it's typical
for people to explode into useless flame wars over the 'leakage' instead
of giving serious thought beyond ego/profit motives to why the leak
occurred.

But, as a notable scientist once said... "Yes, but the whole point of
the warrant canary is lost if you keep it a secret! Why didn't you tell
the world, eh!?!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmCKJi3CKGE

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151011/9f2ef65a/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list