Cryptome has been leaking its user logs for over a year

Michael Best themikebest at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 05:58:36 PDT 2015


That was it, that the slide might not be authentic or could have been an
internal GCHQ mockup. I thought that was worthy of discussion and
exploration, but then John accused me of faking the data
<https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/651777707873837056>.


> *Juan* juan.g71 at gmail.com
>
> <juan.g71%40gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20Cryptome%20has%20been%20leaking%20its%20user%20logs%20for%20over%20a%20year&In-Reply-To=%3C56166710.4237370a.4285d.552d%40mx.google.com%3E>*Thu
> Oct 8 08:58:03 EDT 2015*
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:26:51 -0400
> Michael Best <themikebest at gmail.com> wrote: >* In summary, I showed that
> the information on the slide could have *>* been mocked up, depsite
> matching the logs for Cryptome.org. * Supposing it was true that you
> proved that *maybe* the
> slide isn't authentic, what then? Are you trying to make a more general
> point? Amd that point
> is...?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1586 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151008/4ac10d96/attachment-0002.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list