[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

[Shelley]

On October 9, 2015 4:51:44 PM Jeremy Compton <j.compton@outlook.com> wrote:

> I am not surprised that GCHQ does what you claim it does.
>

Have you read about this from the beginning?  If so, you'd know that Mike 
Best is not the one claiming that the GCHQ slide is real.  He is trying to 
establish whether nearly anyone could have made the slide with the logs 
Cryptome leaked/distributed/whatever, unwittingly or otherwise.  That's 
all, and I don't know how a researcher trying to verify data has become a 
giant shitstorm.

-S

> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:11:50 -0400
> Subject: [cryptome]
> From: themikebest@gmail.com
> To: cryptome@freelists.org
>
> To the original point, the GCHQ Snowden slide. Cryptome accusing me of 
> faking the data was a diversion. Only had to verify it because of the GCHQ 
> slide.
> From: Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
> <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:00:48 +1300So, now you 
> have named and shamed Cryptome for this grievance you have, whereto
> know?
>