President Vladimir Putin Tells USA Journalist How The USA Is Supporting ISIS.

Zenaan Harkness zen@freedbms.net
Thu Oct 8 06:00:06 PDT 2015


Putin is nothing if not consistent - great to see :)
Z


On 10/8/15, Jim <jim.sovereign@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kenneth Barrett
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 3:57 AM
> Subject: President Vladimir Putin Tells USA Journalist How The USA Is
> Supporting ISIS.
>
>
> TUESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2015
> President Vladimir Putin Tells USA Journalist How The USA Is Supporting
> ISIS
>
> UPDATED OCTOBER 3, 2015
>
> In a press conference at the Valdai Discussion Club 2014 in answer to a
> question to a United States Journalist, President Vladimir Putin addressed
> his concerns regarding the US and their role in the middle east and ISIS.
> Although the film footage of the press conference has been banned, Live
> leaks released a copy of the press conference to the public. The words of
> Putin are transcribed below word for word from the video originally provided
> by  Inessa S.
>
> The press and mainstream news has been avoiding this information. It is a
> scathing , diplomatic account of Russia’s position on the politic behavior
> and actions in the middle east regarding Syria and ISIS, as well as a
> reprimand to our press who have failed to do their job.
>
> Putin’s complete oration to the US Journalists:
>
> First point. I never said that I view the US as a threat to our national
> security. President Obama, as you said, views Russia as a threat, but I
> don’t feel the same way about the US. What I do feel is that the politics of
> those in the circles of power, if I may use those terms, the politics of
> those in power is erroneous. It not only contradicts our national interests,
> it undermines any trust we had in the United States. And in that way it
> actually harms the United states as well.
>
> Undermined trust, with the understanding that they are one of the global
> leaders in politics and in matters of the economy.
>
> I can stay silent on many things, but as I always say, and Dominic here has
> mentioned it, “one sided actions” in the continuous search for the next
> “alliance” and coalitions which are predetermined – this is not a method
> that seeks to discus and agree on mutual grounds of understanding. These are
> one sided actions. They are carried out all the time. They lead to crises.
>
> I’ve said this before, another threat that President Obama mentioned was
> ISIS. Well who on earth armed them? Who armed the Syrians that were fighting
> with Assad? Who created the necessary political information and climate that
> facilitated this situation?
>
> Who pushed for the delivery of arms to the area? Do you really not
> understand who is fighting in Syria?
>
> They are mercenaries mostly. Do you understand they are paid money?
> Mercenaries fight for which ever side pays more. So they arm them and pay
> them a certain amount. I even know what these amounts are. So they fight.
> They have the arms. You can’t get them to return the weapons of course, at
> the end.
>
> Then they discover elsewhere pays a little more…so they go fight there. Then
> they occupy the oil fields.
>
> Where ever in Iraq, Syria, they start extracting the oil and this oil is
> purchased by somebody. Where are the sanctions on the parties purchasing
> this oil?
>
> Do you believe the US does not know who is buying it? Is it not their allies
> that are buying oil from Isis? Do you not think the US has the power to
> influence their allies? Or is the point that they indeed do not wish to
> influence them?
>
> Then why bomb ISIS? In areas they started extracting oil and paying
> mercenaries more in theose areas the rebels from “civilized” Syrian
> opposition forces immediately join ISIS, because they pay more. I consider
> this absolutely unprofessional politics. It is not grounded on facts, in the
> real world.
>
> We must support civilized, democratic opposition in Syria. So you support,
> arm them, and then tomorrow they join ISIS. Can they not think a step ahead?
> We don’t stand for this kind of politics of the US. We consider it to be
> wrong. It harms all parties, including you (USA).
>
> When it comes to the consideration of our national interests I would really
> like it if people like you (US journalists) who posed the questions, would
> one day head your government. Maybe then we can somehow reverse the
> situation.
>
> If that doesn’t happen, I will at least ask you to deliver my messages to
> your government. To the President of the United States, the Vice President,
> and all other relevant people. Tell them that we do not want or look for any
> confrontation whatsoever. When you start to consider our national interests
> in your actions, any other disagreements we may have they will
> self-regulate. This needs to be done, not just talked about. You must
> consider the interests of others, and you must respect other people.
>
> You cannot “squeeze” others having considered only the benefits that you
> require from whatever… in economies, in your military activities, in
> everything. Look at Iraq the situation is terrible. Look at Libya and what
> you did there, that got your ambassador murdered.
>
> Was it us that did this?
>
> You even had a security council decision to establish a no fly zone. What
> for? It was so that Gaddafi’s air force couldn’t fly over and bomb the
> rebels. This wasn’t the smartest decision, but okay… what did you proceed to
> do yourselves? You started bombing the territory. This is in clear
> contravention of the security council resolution. It is even outright
> aggression over a state. Was it us that did this? You did this with your
> bare hands.
>
> And it ended with the murder of your Ambassador. Who’s fault is it? It is
> your fault. Is it a good result that your Ambassador was murdered? It is
> actually a terrible catastrophe.
>
> But do not look around for somebody to blame when it is you making these
> mistakes. You must do the opposite; rise above the endless desire to
> dominate. You must stop acting out of imperialistic ambitions. Do not poison
> the consciousness of millions of people like there can be no other way but
> imperialistic politics.
>
> We will never forget our relationship when we supported the US in the war of
> independence (civil war). We will never forget that we collaborated in both
> world wars as allies. I personally believe that the geo strategic interests
> of Russia and the US are essentially the same. We must focus on this
> interrelationship.
>
> Written by Dianne Marshall
>
> The following video was translated by Inessa S .  A grateful thank you to
> Inessa S. for all her effort to get this news out to the people.
>
> https://jhaines6a.wordpress.com/2015/10/06/putin-exposes-obamas-paid-isis-mercenaries-in-middle-east-and-syria/
> Posted by enerchi at 10/06/2015 08:09:00 PM  Reactions:
>
> Labels: Government Corruption, New World Order, World News Headlines



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list