[cryptome] Re: cryptome-nov2015

[Michael Best]

> The archives should prominently display this disavowal and name the
> archive "Cryptome-Disavows-This-Corrupt-Archive."

Is that how you'll label and name the files when you send them out? 

Seriously, John, this is getting a little ridiculous. Is it really that easy to fake a hash and sig while making thousands of files appear to be what it's supposed to be and still add up and hash correctly? 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 28, 2015, at 5:49 PM, John Young <jya at pipeline.com> wrote:
> 
> Cryptome disavows mirrors of its archive, all of them, due to ease
> and evidence of tampering with files, hashes, signatures and insertion
> of implants by the host, platform, route, service or all.
> 
> The archives should prominently display this disavowal and name the
> archive "Cryptome-Disavows-This-Corrupt-Archive."
> 
> 
> 
> At 05:10 PM 11/28/2015, you wrote:
>> cryptome-nov2015.tar.bz  76GByte Nov 28 05:58 sha256
>> 22572573c0538e09bf554f475f3113fbbd33920e2bf6691f65450ea8e2333edb
>> 
>> [ seeding... plz wait... ]
>> 
>> Content-Type: image/png; name="cryptome-nov2015.png"
>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cryptome-nov2015.png"
>> X-Attachment-Id: f_ihjnir3o0
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2535 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151128/ce4d1093/attachment-0002.txt>