juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 01:12:45 PDT 2015
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:42:32 -0700
coderman <coderman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/15, Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
> > There isn't much proof that 'enough incentives' will get
> > the job done. You just restated a baseless assertion.
> just because we've never had AP does not mean that it won't work.
Sure. But I never said "It won't work because it's new". I'm
just asking for more details.
> there are plenty of cases where those with privileged access and
> lifetime reputation betray it for roughly millions or less, in USD.
It seems (kinda obvious) to me that to get rid of 'high
ranking' targets you need a 'professional' service, agree?
You are saying that those targets will be taken down by
'traitors'? That can happen sometimes but I don't think it
would be common. Also notice that 'traitors' a la snowden don't
do it for money. And he didn't kill anybody either (and he's no
Yet you are saying that a 'modern', big, very well
funded government can be overthrown by buying off some of its
members with a few million dollars?
> the rest, assuming AP exists, becomes probabilities and patience.
More information about the cypherpunks