Appeals Court Stayed: Re: Judge enjoins NSA to not collect metadata on attorney or his law firm.

[John Young]

Judge Leon's opinion was published on November 9 and the Appeals stay
the next day.

https://cryptome.org/2015/11/klayman-158-159.pdf

 From the Appeals stay:

"ORDERED that the district court's order issued November 9, 2015, be stayed
pending further order of the court."



At 01:47 PM 11/12/2015, you wrote:
>The document url you cited, an order by the District Judge, was 
>dated the same day as "An appeals court stayed the judge's order on 
>10 November 2015."
>That would be a quick stay!   Are we talking about the same stay?
>       Jim Bell
>
>
>From: John Young <jya at pipeline.com>
>To: cypherpunks at cpunks.org
>Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:35 AM
>Subject: Appeals Court Stayed: Re: Judge enjoins NSA to not collect 
>metadata on attorney or his law firm.
>
>An appeals court stayed the judge's order on 10 November 2015.
>DoJ filed 241 pages to win the stay:
>
><https://cryptome.org/2015/11/klayman-stay-15-1110.pdf>https://cryptome.org/2015/11/klayman-stay-15-1110.pdf 
>(8.1MB)
>
>
>
>
>
>At 11:21 AM 11/12/2015, you wrote:
>
> >Does anyone here actually believe the NSA gives a fuck what some pissant
> >federal judge says?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1626 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151112/dcff9f50/attachment-0002.txt>