UK To Ban Crypto In Devices, Email And More
Razer
Rayzer at riseup.net
Thu Nov 5 08:13:05 PST 2015
On 11/04/2015 11:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Which will in turn be outlawed by the runaway govt.
> As will any other game you play with them while they are in control.
> You have to stop the runaway govt, not the crypto.
It WOULD be interesting if the attacker was identified. Which nation
would prosecute? A nation with a government that believes in it's
citizen's privacy. IOW, no one will prosecute.
Governments, in collusion for their common interest, are above their own
laws.
RR
As a series of tweets:
https://twitter.com/AuntieImperial/status/662289782525964288
On 11/04/2015 11:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:09 AM, jim bell <jdb10987 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> The UK government is able to do this, in part because UK doesn't have a
>> Constitution,
>> merely a Parliament. Needless to say, the writers of the Magna Carta
>> It occurs to me there may be at least two workarounds for this:
> Which will in turn be outlawed by the runaway govt.
> As will any other game you play with them while they are in control.
> You have to stop the runaway govt, not the crypto.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151105/2c147bdc/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list