progression of technologies

[Lodewijk andré de la porte]

2015-06-25 21:44 GMT+09:00 z9wahqvh <z9wahqvh at gmail.com>:

> this is absolutely tremendous, original, and insightful. in my opinion.


This is exceedingly strange coming from an In-Q-Tel security officer.
In-Q-Tel basically invests in anything performing more collections in the
US. Does Dan Geer worry for the future, and effectively betray In-Q-Tel?
Does he want to prevent anyone *else* from getting the nice intel? What
exactly does he want to make information processors liable for?

How can law prevent third parties associating freely available information?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 954 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150626/b84169f4/attachment-0002.txt>