Russia and China crack Snowden Cache

[Juan]

On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:35:54 -0400
Tim Beelen <tim at diffalt.com> wrote:

> It was a rhetorical question; no they did not come up with a binding 
> resolution. That is how the UN enforces policy. Binding resolutions.
> 
> So, my point is, what is the point of having international laws that
> no one is willing to enforce.
> 
> There is no ignoring plain facts. You just did not get it. Stop
> smoking lettuce.



	You asked for even more proof of your government being a
	criminal enterprise and that's what Razer provided. 

	And here's more 

	https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif


	Fact : your fucking government is a criminal organization
	even by their own standards. 

	Now go cry in the corner.




> 
> On 6/17/2015 7:20 PM, Juan wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:33:27 -0400
> > Tim Beelen <tim at diffalt.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So did they pass a resolution as such that I'm unaware of?
> >
> > 	So little Timmy is ignoring plain facts.
> >
> > 	Completely unsurprising.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Is there an international court that is willing to persecute?
> >>
> >> And also because first and foremost the U.S. does not acknowledge
> >> The Hague. But the EU does acknowledge US laws. Which is nice.
> >>
> >> So, did they pass a resolution or not?
> >>
> >> On 6/17/2015 4:49 PM, Razer wrote:
> >>> On 06/17/2015 01:28 PM, Tim Beelen wrote:
> >>>> You're conflating a bunch of things.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can't have a criminal organization without crime, which
> >>>> require illegality, which requires laws which require a
> >>>> governing body. A government usually does not declare itself
> >>>> illegal so, no, it's not going to be a criminal enterprise.
> >>>>
> >>> Expecting criminals to adjudicate themselves as such is a little
> >>> beyond the pall so lets cut to the chase here,  based on one
> >>> criminal action for the moment. The US subscribes to the UN
> >>> charter and what passes for international law, which to a huge
> >>> extent the US had a guiding hand in shaping.
> >>>
> >>> The UN allowed the United States leeway to literally invade Iraq
> >>> based on evidence presented known to be lies at the time they were
> >>> told, by almost everyone in the US government in a position to
> >>> authorize policy, diplomatic OR war-related, on Iraq
> >>>
> >>> The US government and all of it's executives committed a criminal
> >>> act under international law by invading Iraq under false pretenses
> >>> and therefore IS an international criminal enterprise that
> >>> continues to this day in that country by our continued, and
> >>> eternal (at least until the oil from there and Iran runs out)
> >>> presence.
> >>>
>